LiveCode Forums.

richmond62 wrote: ↑

Sat Feb 07, 2026 1:40 pm

LLM?

Loud Laughing Moron?

PATA: People Addicted To Acronyms.

FDFO: Fun Derived From Obfuscation.

PACUTA: Pushing A Carrot Up Trump's . . .

Not sure if that is an attempt at humour, or just genuine ignorance.

Maybe you should ask chatGPT instead of posting lame sarcastic comments.

LLM?

Loud Laughing Moron?

PATA: People Addicted To Acronyms.

FDFO: Fun Derived From Obfuscation.

PACUTA: Pushing A Carrot Up Trump's . . .

You can perform code obfuscation before creating a standalone application by creating your own commands. Replace functions and commands with meaningless commands and store everything in a local variable, avoiding the use of global variables. ...

It all depends on the architecture of the page. Is it a publicly accessible page, and is there any kind of security, obfuscation or paywall? There may be some effort made by the site owner not to allow direct linking, and even if not, with multiple files to select the chances are ...

Password Obfuscation:

search.php?keywords=obfuscation

Nice job

Just a thought.

If you "feel funny" about using numToCodePoint(9679) (black blob)

you can use numToCodePoint(8226) (standard Unicode Password obfuscation black blob)

you get this 'blob' if you type ALT/OPT 8 on a Macintosh.

If you buy the commercial version, user can't see your code. You have encrypt with password option on your stacks.

... in commercial builds if you use a password on your stackfiles (the password protection is the first level, the second is an extra layer of obfuscation applied when the standalone is built). 4) Jailbroken devices: We will need to investigate how to detect this! Hope this helps, Mark.

... application that we are developing for some_big_company required some technical solutions to pass the security test. I read your answer about Code Obfuscation too. This and a few other items need to be implemented on our app. If you can help me to get proper answers to this questions it will be ...

@Gurgen: Only a small part of the engine is written in Java on Android - the majority is native code - so the amount of Java which could be protected is very small (also we are open-source, so the code is freely available online). Is there a specific reason why you would need to obfuscate the engine...

Hi Livecoders,

Is it possible to do Livecode Android app code obfuscation? I know Google has included one of the most popular of these tools, ProGuard, as part of the Android SDK. Is there any way to enable it?

Thanks,
Gurgen

Hi Genie, Would obfuscation instead of encryption work for you? OK all you cipher guys can start laughing now. :oops: I think the original encryption was just a letter placement number e.g. a=1, b=2, c=3 etc. function pencrypt pText ...

... with it, much as you'll find with any tool: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/tidesdk One of the questions I found there was about code obfuscation. Does TideSDK leave all your JavaScript exposed as browsers do, or is there some means of protecting code? I can't deploy to iOS from Windows ...