Search found 20 matches: obfuscation
Searched query: obfuscation
- Sun Apr 21, 2024 5:46 am
- Forum: Talking LiveCode
- Topic: Security Issue Related to Decompilation in LiveCode
- Replies: 13
- Views: 9432
Re: Security Issue Related to Decompilation in LiveCode
You can perform code obfuscation before creating a standalone application by creating your own commands. Replace functions and commands with meaningless commands and store everything in a local variable, avoiding the use of global variables. ...
- Wed Jun 01, 2022 7:19 am
- Forum: Getting Started with LiveCode - Complete Beginners
- Topic: URL of audio or video playing
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4495
Re: URL of audio or video playing
It all depends on the architecture of the page. Is it a publicly accessible page, and is there any kind of security, obfuscation or paywall? There may be some effort made by the site owner not to allow direct linking, and even if not, with multiple files to select the chances are ...
- Tue Jun 16, 2020 12:53 pm
- Forum: Getting Started with LiveCode - Complete Beginners
- Topic: First time on web... not so good
- Replies: 7
- Views: 4080
- Sat Mar 03, 2018 12:39 pm
- Forum: Getting Started with LiveCode - Complete Beginners
- Topic: Password Obfuscation
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2042
Re: Password Obfuscation
Nice job 

- Sat Mar 03, 2018 9:49 am
- Forum: Getting Started with LiveCode - Complete Beginners
- Topic: Password Obfuscation
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2042
Password Obfuscation
Just a thought.
- Tue Oct 31, 2017 1:51 pm
- Forum: Getting Started with LiveCode - Complete Beginners
- Topic: Hide chars field password
- Replies: 18
- Views: 12193
Re: Hide chars field password
If you "feel funny" about using numToCodePoint(9679) (black blob)
you can use numToCodePoint(8226) (standard Unicode Password obfuscation black blob)
you get this 'blob' if you type ALT/OPT 8 on a Macintosh.
you can use numToCodePoint(8226) (standard Unicode Password obfuscation black blob)
you get this 'blob' if you type ALT/OPT 8 on a Macintosh.
- Tue Jul 25, 2017 3:44 pm
- Forum: Android Deployment
- Topic: Binary Protection: Insufficient Code Obfuscation
- Replies: 2
- Views: 4019
Re: Binary Protection: Insufficient Code Obfuscation
If you buy the commercial version, user can't see your code. You have encrypt with password option on your stacks.
- Thu Jul 13, 2017 12:16 pm
- Forum: iOS Deployment
- Topic: Enable Automatic Reference Counting
- Replies: 4
- Views: 5374
Re: Enable Automatic Reference Counting
... in commercial builds if you use a password on your stackfiles (the password protection is the first level, the second is an extra layer of obfuscation applied when the standalone is built). 4) Jailbroken devices: We will need to investigate how to detect this! Hope this helps, Mark.
- Thu Jul 13, 2017 8:38 am
- Forum: iOS Deployment
- Topic: Enable Automatic Reference Counting
- Replies: 4
- Views: 5374
Re: Enable Automatic Reference Counting
... application that we are developing for some_big_company required some technical solutions to pass the security test. I read your answer about Code Obfuscation too. This and a few other items need to be implemented on our app. If you can help me to get proper answers to this questions it will be ...
- Thu Jul 13, 2017 7:07 am
- Forum: Android Deployment
- Topic: Binary Protection: Insufficient Code Obfuscation
- Replies: 2
- Views: 4019
Re: Binary Protection: Insufficient Code Obfuscation
@Gurgen: Only a small part of the engine is written in Java on Android - the majority is native code - so the amount of Java which could be protected is very small (also we are open-source, so the code is freely available online). Is there a specific reason why you would need to obfuscate the engine...
- Wed Jul 12, 2017 6:31 pm
- Forum: Android Deployment
- Topic: Binary Protection: Insufficient Code Obfuscation
- Replies: 2
- Views: 4019
Binary Protection: Insufficient Code Obfuscation
Hi Livecoders,
Is it possible to do Livecode Android app code obfuscation? I know Google has included one of the most popular of these tools, ProGuard, as part of the Android SDK. Is there any way to enable it?
Thanks,
Gurgen
Is it possible to do Livecode Android app code obfuscation? I know Google has included one of the most popular of these tools, ProGuard, as part of the Android SDK. Is there any way to enable it?
Thanks,
Gurgen
- Fri Jan 11, 2013 12:30 am
- Forum: Getting Started with LiveCode - Complete Beginners
- Topic: encrypt word
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3689
Re: encrypt word
Hi Genie, Would obfuscation instead of encryption work for you? OK all you cipher guys can start laughing now. :oops: I think the original encryption was just a letter placement number e.g. a=1, b=2, c=3 etc. function pencrypt pText ...
- Sat Dec 29, 2012 1:53 am
- Forum: Getting Started with LiveCode - Complete Beginners
- Topic: LiveCode vs. Web Dev Tools
- Replies: 26
- Views: 24123
Re: LiveCode vs. Web
... with it, much as you'll find with any tool: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/tidesdk One of the questions I found there was about code obfuscation. Does TideSDK leave all your JavaScript exposed as browsers do, or is there some means of protecting code? I can't deploy to iOS from Windows ...
- Fri Dec 07, 2012 5:02 pm
- Forum: Android Deployment
- Topic: Encryption, SQLite and Android
- Replies: 7
- Views: 10646
Re: Encryption, SQLite and Android
... against the encrypted values and unencrypted values that the user might be interested in. Depending on what you mean by "encryption" (i.e. if obfuscation is enough), then you could just encode the values somehow (e.g. Base64encode), where you would then be able to encode a search term and ...
- Sat Mar 31, 2012 10:52 pm
- Forum: Feature Proposals
- Topic: good enough?
- Replies: 9
- Views: 7572
Re: good enough?
... for that ("put img 1 into img 2"). Support for custom controls is available as a feature of groups. Syntax was recently added to help with that. Obfuscation and encryption of intellectual property is available by setting a password on the stack. Scripts and stack content are encrypted and scrambled ...