Re: Design best practises - libraries, sub-stacks
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2014 9:31 pm
Jacque.
Horizontal? Really? I am so enamored of, and used to, and set in my ways because of, and, ahem, sorry...
I think the pyramid is so utterly natural. Not that most "flowcharts" of the message path, (dating back to both Goodman and the original Apple HC user guide) actually use a pyramid. After all, we are not talking about food groups, but rather the concept that several different kinds of controls lie at a "base" layer, and feed into ever higher and more sparsely populated upper layers.
And I really do not care which way is up; that is actually a detail. But this is how I would always try to convey this concept to a new user.
Now it is no secret that, apart from the control layer, there is only on object residing on each upper layer. So what? The pyramid is a bit distorted is all. But remember the dynamic path? Just try to display that while lying down...
Craig
Horizontal? Really? I am so enamored of, and used to, and set in my ways because of, and, ahem, sorry...
I think the pyramid is so utterly natural. Not that most "flowcharts" of the message path, (dating back to both Goodman and the original Apple HC user guide) actually use a pyramid. After all, we are not talking about food groups, but rather the concept that several different kinds of controls lie at a "base" layer, and feed into ever higher and more sparsely populated upper layers.
And I really do not care which way is up; that is actually a detail. But this is how I would always try to convey this concept to a new user.
Now it is no secret that, apart from the control layer, there is only on object residing on each upper layer. So what? The pyramid is a bit distorted is all. But remember the dynamic path? Just try to display that while lying down...
Craig