oracle and valentina
Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2012 4:44 pm
Just a quick question before I add a note to the dictionary.. (and its probably been noted elsewhere already or i'm misunderstanding something)
both valentina and oracle still appear in the list of valid database types in the documentation. Both return "revdberr,invalid database type" so my assumption is this is no longer correct but wanted to make sure i'm not doing anything wrong before adding a note. Or should it be a bug report- documentation?
valentina has the adk+ (or you can use odbc i'd guess) so paid support still exists for valentina, but what about oracle? (not that it will ever affect me, because cost matters!)
both valentina and oracle still appear in the list of valid database types in the documentation. Both return "revdberr,invalid database type" so my assumption is this is no longer correct but wanted to make sure i'm not doing anything wrong before adding a note. Or should it be a bug report- documentation?
valentina has the adk+ (or you can use odbc i'd guess) so paid support still exists for valentina, but what about oracle? (not that it will ever affect me, because cost matters!)