@Jean-Marc.
You did nothing to be ashamed of. This is spiraling out of control. Bruce mistook you for me, and now you are mistaking you for "do".I don't suggest using "do" in my post.
Yipes.
Craig
Moderators: FourthWorld, heatherlaine, Klaus, kevinmiller, robinmiller
You did nothing to be ashamed of. This is spiraling out of control. Bruce mistook you for me, and now you are mistaking you for "do".I don't suggest using "do" in my post.
Bruce mistook you for me, and now you are mistaking you for "do
Not really, there are occasions where "do" is required and useful. The reason to avoid it when possible is because it has to load the compiler on every instance which creates unnecessary overhead. The same is true for the value function.I mention this because "do" constructions are considered old-fashioned
As in this case, I believe.Not really, there are occasions where "do" is required
Code: Select all
on mouseUp
put "All or Nothing or Something" into temp
do "answer test with" && temp
end mouseUp
Code: Select all
on mouseUp
put "All or Nothing or Something" into temp
do "get" && temp
answer "test" with it
end mouseUp