how can I delete the shadow color of the text

[longzexd]

how can delete the shadow white color of my text in the field, I set the background to the dark blue color, then I see the shadow color, Thanks

[bogs]

I think you must mean the backgroundColor of the text itself. Just set that to the same background color you have surrounding it, and only the foregroundColor of the text will be there.

[richmond62]

-
In my snapshot above the first field does NOT have its text selected,
while in the second field the text IS selected.
-
setting the shadow color and the fill color doesn't seem to make any observable difference whatsoever.
-

[Klaus]

Hi all,

since there is no UI to set a field's "shadow" (and e.g. shadowoffset) property to TRUE or FALSE in the "Property Inspector", you need to do this via the message box, I also suspect that the text is just hilited in the field.

If that is the case, simply "select empty" in a (mouseup or whatever) script will remove this.


Best

Klaus

[richmond62]

@Claus: "Richard" got there first.

[Klaus]

@Claus

My name is Klaus with a K!

@"Richard" got there first.

That's why I wrote ALSO.

[richmond62]

My name is Klaus with a K!

No, really?

"Richard"

[Klaus]

Yes, really, because "Klaus" is my first name and not "Santa"!

[longzexd]

Thanks all, I don't know why my text has shadow color, however, After I deleted the old one and drag a new label. then everything is fine.

[richmond62]

Clause Kraas is a good friend of mine:

https://www.facebook.com/claas.krause.5
-

-

-

He does NOT have a shadow color.

[Klaus]

Aha.


Your message contains 4 characters.
You need to enter at least 10 characters.

[jacque]

I think bogs nailed it, that's what you get when you set the backcolor of a text chunk. You can remove it by setting the backcolor of the chunk to empty. I use this technique to allow users of textbook material to highlight passages.

[richmond62]

-
A picture is often worth a thousand words.

[bogs]

Yes, really, because "Klaus" is my first name and not "Santa"!

Oh stop fibbing, I saw you rocking that red suit last year

I think bogs nailed it...

Well, it had to happen eventually

[dunbarx]

I wrote a complex LC application to determine the ratio of pertinent replies, on-subject, divided by nonsense, however adorable.

The result was 0.00042

Craig

Edit. Uh oh, now it is 0.000042.

Edit. Uh oh ...