stam wrote: ↑Wed Sep 29, 2021 10:44 pm
It's a bit of stretch to say that because of a broken promise in 1996 you don't trust the whole company forever more...
On the contrary, neither trust nor even blame are at all relevant to my relationships with vendors.
I consider that HyperCard moment, along with the moment it became clear SuperCard would never ship their Windows version, merely liberating.
After those experiences I live more simply, and run my business more effectively, with less blame on others and taking full responsibility for my own tooling choices:
If a product exists, it exists. If it doesn't yet exist, it doesn't exist.
I don't need to spend an ounce of mental energy on ideas that might or might not exist as actual tools at some possible future time.
Only things delivered to my hands where I can evaluate their fitness for the task I'm working on at the moment matter to me.
Ideas are just ideas; fun, but not tooling I can put to work. Intentions are often good, but intentions are not tooling.
So I use what exists, and ignore what doesn't.
Since then my business has grown, as have my relationships with my company's vendors.
As you said, what does trust have to do with this conversation about tooling options?
--
My concerns about FAANG are a separate matter, though admittedly I didn't clarify that earlier. Like many other netizens, and most legislators, I'm increasingly uncomfortable with having most of what happens on the world's Internet controlled by just five CEOs.
In all fairness, the "N" there may be a bit dated, since Netflix has shown itself it be a reasonably responsible steward of the data it collects and how it uses it in negotiating global media distribution. Twitter, however, remains a karmic cesspool of state actor psyops botfarms tolerated to keep perceived audience sizes appearing large for advertisers. So maybe "FAATG" would better reflect the current state of play.