LiveCode Forums.

... seems so ...

AAAAH ... dhuuu (it must be the time....lol) my bad, sorry...

so, livecode shifts automatically all other layers to fill the gap of the "moved" layer, correct ?

As I said, it is working just fine :) I'm just not getting why. If you see the attached img, you will see the initial layer of each object. if we click on the image (yellow square), by the code, the new layer for it would be 3+3 = 6. However, the system is only assigning it to layer 5. This is the b...

I saw your script an did works just fine (I even duplicated the group inside and its continues to work fine) But I'm a little bit confused about the layers. I thought that the layers were global to the stack Following your script: on mouseUp if the owner of the target is me then put the layer of me ...

Thanks, I have also read something about "start editing group..." and it seems that it also helps in this situation. It seems that allows you to manipulate only the objects in that group without interfering with everything else ex: you can sent a control to the top and that will bring the control to...

Thanks for the suggestion. This type of implementation was what I had in mind, but wanted to know if there were any other "simpler/better" way to do it. Regarding re-layering ... If I have a group1 and inside it group2 and I want to modify something on group2, do I need to set the "relayerGroupedCon...

All layers are visible at same time and the user can interact with any object on any layer

@ FourthWorld : I will give a look at the Relayer command, thanks @dunbarx : Let me try to give you some more insight and you tell me if you thinks that groups can work. This application will allow creation of a digital boardgame. The first layer (bottom one) will contain one or more game boards (ge...

Hi everyone, On an application I'm implementing I will need to manage objects on layers. As mentioned on the subject, what I want is the same behaviour that can be found (for example) on Adobe Illutratior. That is: There are 1 or more layers Each layer may contain zero or more objects The objects on...

Okidoky

thanks

Lets see if an image helps

Imagine a stake like this, where the field OPTION (in red) define which fields are visible below it:



Is it clearer now ?

OK maybe I did not explain correctly. I know how to check for changes on the option button and based on that, execute something. My question was regarding the fields that should be visible / hidden. The idea is that the fields will be displayed on the same place (so no empty areas when ones disappea...

Hi everyone, On my application, I have a stack that will work as a options dialog. On this stack I have several fields, but some of the fields should be different based on the value of a option button (one of the fixed fields). EX: -------------------- Field AA Field BB Option Button = 1 >> Field CC...

hmm I thought that Ir could be possible to get the path in a generic way without providing the full path (as you do). Seems that that is the way to go... about "revXMLEvaluateXPath" ... I didn't knew that handlers ... it's not on the API Dictionary :( is there any other "new" XML related handlers?? ...

Thanks, Will have a look at these