LiveCode Forums.

Maybe it was always naive to believe that the software first touted as for the "rest of us" could ever survive growing up in the world we currently live in. The good ol' days are for the most part gone, in whatever guise that phrase applies. That is normal. Again, I hope that the silence felt among ...

Richmond.

Is this news ominous, terrific or not news at all?

Craig

Lorena.

Your English is fine. My understanding is awful.

There has been much "public" debate about all this for a couple of years, which is why I posted as I did. Anyway, Scotland is rather silent these days.

Craig

Lorena. When you say "public response" do you mean from LiveCode or from people like you and I? I do not know if am disappointed about the seeming silence from Scotland. They have, to be fair, tried to both explain and assure "us" quite a bit in the past. They may think they have done the best they ...

Hmmm. Any other messages that work in the IDE (wherever they are placed) but not as a standalone? I thought a complete engine was ported into the .app bundle, and everything worked exactly the same. I assume that was naive. At least it does not "crash" in that the app does not automatically quit. Cr...

Klaus makes the point that everything in LC is just a stack. I forget that now and then, thinking (or rather not thinking at all) that the answer dialog is some different sort of object class. it is not. Putting that handler in the card script also crashes the standalone. But even if the standalone ...

Alex.

Wow. The app never opened at all. Removing that handler fixed it. Anyone have any insight?

If there is anyone listening in Scotland these days, I would report it.

Craig

Turns out that my standalone app was crashing when it executed an answer command during initialisation. I guess the UI was not in a state to display the dialog (or something like that). Glad you got is resolved, but I do not understand something. When you say "...executed an answer command during i...

Klaus is right. Contact her directly.

Craig

Lorena. Ahem, You are right to bring this back. I think that LC has tried to answer all these questions over the course of a couple of years. Yet it seems that there is no complete "FAQ", however it was piecemeal assembled, that answers questions such as yours. I suspect that such answers have not y...

Richard. This is a temporary glitch in the matrix; Exactly. The British say that the United States always gets it right, but only after trying everything else wrong first. This is normal. The entire planet is watching the US carefully these days with trepidation, often with disdain. That is the way ...

Jacque. The good news is that you are still here. The bad news is that I have tried to use this little trick before, possibly due to you. And yes, 99% is visually the same, but though the graphic, no longer transparent, can now receive mouse actions, the underlying scrollbar on the field cannot. So ...

It does work with opaque set to "true". But that should not matter. It seems to me a bug. If others agree, I will send to to QC. This came about from a post on the use-list, where the OP want to find a message that was sent when the cursor stopped dragging in the scrollbar of a field. There is very ...

Attached is a rather simple stack with a graphic and a field. There is a single handler, a "mouseLeave" handler, and it is in the graphic script. But if one moves the cursor in an out of that graphic, the mouseLeave handler fires both in and out, as if there was a "mouseEnter" handler in existence a...

Stan.

Are you saying that operator malfunction was somehow involved here?

Craig