Search found 12 matches
- Fri Nov 09, 2007 7:13 pm
- Forum: Announcements
- Topic: E&M Verify, medical coding developed in RR, in public be
- Replies: 0
- Views: 4253
E&M Verify, medical coding developed in RR, in public be
I am releasing E&M Verify, a medical coding application developed with RR, as a public beta. I would deeply appreciate feedback from other RR developers, and have set up a forum at www.RushRunware.com. I would particularly appreciate commentary regarding: • platform- or hardware-specific issues â€...
- Sun Nov 04, 2007 1:51 am
- Forum: Windows
- Topic: PC standalone from Mac ignores commands/functions/globals
- Replies: 15
- Views: 16573
≥, ≤
Mark--
Damn, such a beginner mistake. I knew this was true about PCs, but forgot to check for it.
Thanks a million, I'll try that out tomorrow.
--AJ
Damn, such a beginner mistake. I knew this was true about PCs, but forgot to check for it.
Thanks a million, I'll try that out tomorrow.
--AJ
- Sun Nov 04, 2007 1:50 am
- Forum: Windows
- Topic: PC standalone from Mac ignores commands/functions/globals
- Replies: 15
- Views: 16573
I reviewed the object hierarchy...
On reviewing the concept of hierarchy in RR, it's obvious why trying to call a procedure which is in a sub-stack from a main stack won't work. Of course, it doesn't explain why all the scripts in the main stack stack script are ignored, but scripts attached to objects work fine so long as they don't...
- Sun Nov 04, 2007 1:14 am
- Forum: Windows
- Topic: PC standalone from Mac ignores commands/functions/globals
- Replies: 15
- Views: 16573
hmm, maybe that wasn't so enlightening after all
I tried the dummy scripts I just described on a Mac. They worked exactly the same way as on the PC: I could call the procedure in the sub-stack's stack script from a button within that stack, but I could not call that procedure from a button on the main stack. That sort of makes sense, that you can'...
- Sun Nov 04, 2007 1:08 am
- Forum: Windows
- Topic: PC standalone from Mac ignores commands/functions/globals
- Replies: 15
- Views: 16573
sub-stack's scripts okay, but can't be called from main
I made up a procedure or two in the stack script of one of the sub-stacks. Tried calling it from an "on mouseUp" handler on a button on that same sub-stack. Worked fine.
Tried calling it from an "on mouseUp" handler on a button on the main stack. Didn't work; got a "can't find handler" error.
Tried calling it from an "on mouseUp" handler on a button on the main stack. Didn't work; got a "can't find handler" error.
- Sun Nov 04, 2007 1:00 am
- Forum: Windows
- Topic: PC standalone from Mac ignores commands/functions/globals
- Replies: 15
- Views: 16573
same thing happens in PC version of Studio 2.8.1
Mark-- I downloaded a demo version of Studio 2.8.1 for the PC (same version as I'm using on the Mac). I opened my stack (the one I sent to you) and the exact same errors are happening. However, I was able to get some insight: I clicked on button whose "on mouseUp" handler has a long script. That scr...
- Sun Nov 04, 2007 12:40 am
- Forum: Windows
- Topic: PC standalone from Mac ignores commands/functions/globals
- Replies: 15
- Views: 16573
Rev Player 2.7.1
Mark-- Looks like Rev Player 2.7.1 I sent the email a while ago, and attached the .rev file in question--please check your spam folder. errorLib's impressive, BTW I tried the script you suggested and it worked fine, as did an "on openStack" version. What on Earth might there be about a stack file th...
- Sat Nov 03, 2007 10:00 pm
- Forum: Windows
- Topic: PC standalone from Mac ignores commands/functions/globals
- Replies: 15
- Views: 16573
no file paths
Nope. No file paths. I've been trying some simple tests with errorLib using Player. On a Mac, it doesn't matter in what order I open the stacks "testing" (original, I know) and "errorLib". I've got a button that initializes errorLib in the testing stack and another that intentionally creates an erro...
- Sat Nov 03, 2007 9:29 pm
- Forum: Windows
- Topic: PC standalone from Mac ignores commands/functions/globals
- Replies: 15
- Views: 16573
errorLib doesn't work on PC, either
Okay, this is getting pretty annoying. As a test, I followed the instructions for errorLib and added a button to my stack with your "a"*2 example. (the initialization was in an "on preOpenStack" handler) On my Mac, I then opened up first errorLib and then my stack with Player. I clicked on the butto...
- Sat Nov 03, 2007 6:59 pm
- Forum: Windows
- Topic: PC standalone from Mac ignores commands/functions/globals
- Replies: 15
- Views: 16573
what the scripts are supposed to do...
The first script which should be run is an "on openStack" handler in the main stack which opens up another stack (the About window). The main stack opens, but not the About stack. The same About window CAN be opened, however, by clicking on the "About" button in the main stack. Seems to be a handler...
- Sat Nov 03, 2007 5:21 pm
- Forum: Windows
- Topic: PC standalone from Mac ignores commands/functions/globals
- Replies: 15
- Views: 16573
there isn't any error info
That's the annoying part of it. No error info at all. It's just that nothing happens, as if the parts of the scripts which use globals or procedure calls weren't there at all. I tried compiling the standalone with the error reporting on, but it just says that there's an error, but doesn't give any a...
- Sat Nov 03, 2007 2:09 pm
- Forum: Windows
- Topic: PC standalone from Mac ignores commands/functions/globals
- Replies: 15
- Views: 16573
PC standalone from Mac ignores commands/functions/globals
I'm running Studio 2.8.1 on an Intel Mac with 10.4.10. I've created a pretty complicated complication (kudos for the learning curve, BTW) which runs and compiles as a standalone just fine on a Mac. In fact, I'm ready to post the public beta, but wanted to post the Mac & PC versions simultaneously. T...