Got a LiveCode personal license? Are you a beginner, hobbyist or educator that's new to LiveCode? This forum is the place to go for help getting started. Welcome!
Moderators: FourthWorld, heatherlaine, Klaus, kevinmiller
-
acidjazz
- Livecode Opensource Backer
- Posts: 93
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 2:37 am
- Location: Tampa, FL
Post
by acidjazz » Sat Jun 14, 2014 12:51 am
What's wrong with this code?
Code: Select all
on mouseUp
put empty into field "results"
repeat with i = 1 to 3
repeat with j = 1 to 4
put i && j && CR after field "results"
wait for .1 second
end repeat
end repeat
end mouseUp
When I run it, the button stays blue for a couple of seconds, and then all the numbers pop up at once.
- Mark
-
sefrojones
- Livecode Opensource Backer
- Posts: 447
- Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2012 12:46 pm
Post
by sefrojones » Sat Jun 14, 2014 1:49 am
I just tried this in LC 6.6.2/ Win7 64bit and It seems to be working here......
the result is
1 1
1 2
1 3
1 4
2 1
2 2
2 3
2 4
3 1
3 2
3 3
3 4
this is entered into the field 1 at a time....
--Sefro
-
acidjazz
- Livecode Opensource Backer
- Posts: 93
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 2:37 am
- Location: Tampa, FL
Post
by acidjazz » Sat Jun 14, 2014 2:10 am
I'm also using 6.6.2 but with Mac OSX 10.90.3
Last edited by
acidjazz on Mon Jun 16, 2014 7:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Klaus
- Posts: 13829
- Joined: Sat Apr 08, 2006 8:41 am
- Location: Germany
-
Contact:
Post
by Klaus » Sat Jun 14, 2014 10:50 am
Hi Mark,
you need to give the engine time to update the screen like this:
...
wait for .1 second WITH messages
...
Best
Klaus
-
acidjazz
- Livecode Opensource Backer
- Posts: 93
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 2:37 am
- Location: Tampa, FL
Post
by acidjazz » Mon Jun 16, 2014 7:10 pm
You know what? It STILL doesn't work.
Here's the code, just as you suggested, Klaus, including the "with messages" suffix to the wait command:
Code: Select all
on mouseUp
put empty into field "results"
repeat with i = 1 to 3
repeat with j = 1 to 4
put i && j && CR after field "results"
wait for .1 second with messages
end repeat
end repeat
end mouseUp
-
bn
- VIP Livecode Opensource Backer
- Posts: 4002
- Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 9:12 pm
- Location: Bochum, Germany
Post
by bn » Mon Jun 16, 2014 7:31 pm
Hi Mark,
try this:
Code: Select all
on mouseUp
put empty into field "results"
repeat with i = 1 to 3
repeat with j = 1 to 4
put i && j && CR after field "results"
unlock screen
wait for 30 milliseconds with messages
end repeat
end repeat
end mouseUp
This works for me on a Mac OSX 10.6.8 LC 6.6.2
Kind regards
Bernd
-
acidjazz
- Livecode Opensource Backer
- Posts: 93
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 2:37 am
- Location: Tampa, FL
Post
by acidjazz » Mon Jun 16, 2014 8:03 pm
Bernd (and Klaus)
This does work, thank you! But why?
It would seem to indicate that the screen is locked by default. But, even if that's true, I would still think that I could place the unlock screen command at the top of the handler (before the repeat loop). But it doesn't. It's still "jumpy" when I place the command outside of the repeat loop. Thus, I can only conclude that the screen locks itself back up every iteration of the loop. I doubt this is true, but you can hopefully see how confused I am.
Thanks,
Mark
-
bn
- VIP Livecode Opensource Backer
- Posts: 4002
- Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 9:12 pm
- Location: Bochum, Germany
Post
by bn » Mon Jun 16, 2014 8:13 pm
Hi Mark,
from what I recall it has to do with Mac screen update. On the Windows side there seems to be no problem. But on a Mac it has to be made explicit.
It used to be like Klaus said: just a short wait with messages was enough for screen update.(just tested up to 6.6.1) But now (6.6.2) one has to explicitely add an unlock screen.
The technical reasons escape me.
Kind regards
Bernd
-
acidjazz
- Livecode Opensource Backer
- Posts: 93
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 2:37 am
- Location: Tampa, FL
Post
by acidjazz » Mon Jun 16, 2014 8:21 pm
Interesting. Wouldn't this qualify as a bug?
Mark
-
bn
- VIP Livecode Opensource Backer
- Posts: 4002
- Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 9:12 pm
- Location: Bochum, Germany
Post
by bn » Mon Jun 16, 2014 8:35 pm
Wouldn't this qualify as a bug?
Well, it probably would. But which one, that unlock screen did not work in previous versions? Unlock screen would seem to be the most intuitive in this circumstance. But you always had to wait with messages to get the screen update. Unlock screen did not refresh the screen in a tight repeat loop.
Now you have to "wait with messages" and "unlock screen". Not at all intuitive.
But then I don't see many use cases for unfolding the filling of a field before the user in a repeat loop.
I am too undecided to file a bug report. Maybe someone else has a stronger opinon on this.
Kind regards
Bernd
-
FourthWorld
- VIP Livecode Opensource Backer
- Posts: 9837
- Joined: Sat Apr 08, 2006 7:05 am
- Location: Los Angeles
-
Contact:
Post
by FourthWorld » Mon Jun 16, 2014 10:15 pm
Any behaviors specific to OS X should probably be tested in v6.7, given the scope of the Cocoa changes.
-
bn
- VIP Livecode Opensource Backer
- Posts: 4002
- Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 9:12 pm
- Location: Bochum, Germany
Post
by bn » Mon Jun 16, 2014 11:04 pm
Hi Richard,
in 6.7 dp4 successive lines from a repeat loop display line by line without "wait with messages" or "unlock screen".
If I remember correctly you had an enhancement request/bug report regarding this behavior which had to be taken out of the built because of side effects in pre 6.7 versions.
So maybe we wait for the final release of 6.7 and live with the behavior pre 6.7.
Kind regards
Bernd
-
FourthWorld
- VIP Livecode Opensource Backer
- Posts: 9837
- Joined: Sat Apr 08, 2006 7:05 am
- Location: Los Angeles
-
Contact:
Post
by FourthWorld » Tue Jun 17, 2014 12:20 am
bn wrote:So maybe we wait for the final release of 6.7 and live with the behavior pre 6.7.
On the contrary, the only way to make sure the
final version of 6.7 no longer has funky Mac-specific workarounds is to begin working with the
test version of 6.7 now.
After release, it'll be too late to fix things in time for release.
-
acidjazz
- Livecode Opensource Backer
- Posts: 93
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 2:37 am
- Location: Tampa, FL
Post
by acidjazz » Tue Jun 17, 2014 1:30 am
I'm afraid this conversation has surpassed my cognitive abilities, but I very much appreciate the (hopefully temporary) workaround, and hope that Mac OSx weirdness is not permanent.
Thanks,
Mark
-
FourthWorld
- VIP Livecode Opensource Backer
- Posts: 9837
- Joined: Sat Apr 08, 2006 7:05 am
- Location: Los Angeles
-
Contact:
Post
by FourthWorld » Tue Jun 17, 2014 1:36 am
acidjazz wrote:I'm afraid this conversation has surpassed my cognitive abilities, but I very much appreciate the (hopefully temporary) workaround, and hope that Mac OSx weirdness is not permanent.
There's a lot of history here with Carbon and such, but the bottom line is that if you work with v6.7, with the understanding that it's still in development, you'll be in a great position to identify and report any odd behaviors we don't want to see in the final release.