Search found 12 matches
- Thu Apr 21, 2016 1:09 pm
- Forum: Getting Started with LiveCode - Experienced Developers
- Topic: Multi-threading and LiveCode
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2114
Multi-threading and LiveCode
I am writing a Proof of Concept where the stack interacts with Web Services. I want to stress the Web Service from a single stack with requests. I'm sort of at a loss as to how to invoke multiple "threads" to the Web Service. Should I use multiple cards with startup scripts? Or a looping structure w...
- Sat Jan 30, 2016 3:41 pm
- Forum: Getting Started with LiveCode - Complete Beginners
- Topic: !!! Stack File Corrupt?
- Replies: 8
- Views: 5833
Re: !!! Stack File Corrupt?
Thanks to all the more experienced folks for advice. I filed a bug report and it's on the list for a fix. The advice on a service which saves versions was well taken. I use the Mozy Service BUT I had saved versions which could not be opened subsequently. There was a good starter stack which I could ...
- Mon Jan 18, 2016 8:47 pm
- Forum: Getting Started with LiveCode - Complete Beginners
- Topic: !!! Stack File Corrupt?
- Replies: 8
- Views: 5833
Re: !!! Stack File Corrupt?
I am having this same sort of issue. I opened the stack in Notepad++ and recreated the work but now it has happened again. All that I can figure is that it is related to the laptop going to sleep with LiveCode open at the time. I am really getting weary of recreating this work.
- Thu Jan 14, 2016 9:32 pm
- Forum: Getting Started with LiveCode - Experienced Developers
- Topic: Stack corrupted (second in 1month)
- Replies: 13
- Views: 9101
Re: Stack corrupted (second in 1month)
Jacqueline,
Thank you for the reply. I am using 7.1.1 exclusively now and I used Notepad ++ to "Cut and Paste" the scripts from the stack which would not open.
So BOTTOM LINE is stick to ONE version of the software!
Regards,
Thomas
Thank you for the reply. I am using 7.1.1 exclusively now and I used Notepad ++ to "Cut and Paste" the scripts from the stack which would not open.
So BOTTOM LINE is stick to ONE version of the software!
Regards,
Thomas
- Wed Jan 13, 2016 9:03 pm
- Forum: Getting Started with LiveCode - Experienced Developers
- Topic: Stack corrupted (second in 1month)
- Replies: 13
- Views: 9101
Stack will not open at all - Whirligig of death spins
I have persistent challenges with a stack that never seems to open. As an example, I worked on it yesterday and the same stack will not open today. However, a copy of the stack will open. I was using a cloud sync service for version control of the stack and thought perhaps that the Cloud service (Mo...
- Fri Jan 08, 2016 12:09 am
- Forum: Windows
- Topic: Dictionary frozen; LC 8 dp11; Win 10
- Replies: 5
- Views: 5266
Re: Dictionary frozen; LC 8 dp11; Win 10
LC 8 DP7 seems pretty stable.
All the releases after that seem a bit wonky.
All the releases after that seem a bit wonky.
- Thu Jan 07, 2016 11:50 pm
- Forum: HTML5
- Topic: HTML 5 and XML Parsing externals
- Replies: 6
- Views: 7075
Re: HTML 5 and XML Parsing externals
Thanks to everyone for the advice and help. The extensions for JSON seem to work properly. FastJson doesn't seem to work for me but that is likely my ignorance. I have not attempted the XML stack approach. I am a bit thick on how to get the extensions to "compile" for the Web....it compiles properly...
- Thu Jan 07, 2016 12:51 am
- Forum: HTML5
- Topic: HTML 5 and XML Parsing externals
- Replies: 6
- Views: 7075
Re: HTML 5 and XML Parsing externals
Peter, thanks for the confirmation.
The Web Service I am using as a source can also produce JSON...It's just not as trivial to parse as using the externals.
So I might have to use that route IF I want to make a Web App.
Perhaps I can code an extension to parse the XML in LiveCode.
The Web Service I am using as a source can also produce JSON...It's just not as trivial to parse as using the externals.
So I might have to use that route IF I want to make a Web App.
Perhaps I can code an extension to parse the XML in LiveCode.
- Wed Jan 06, 2016 10:50 pm
- Forum: HTML5
- Topic: HTML 5 and XML Parsing externals
- Replies: 6
- Views: 7075
HTML 5 and XML Parsing externals
I am in the middle of creating an app which uses revxml commands to parse XML returning from a Web Service. Does anyone on the forum have experience with this combination? The "regular" build works fine for Windows...since I can include the XML externals. So any information would be useful. Thank yo...
- Mon Jan 04, 2016 4:28 pm
- Forum: LiveCode Builder
- Topic: LC8 DP 7 - Is this the most feature complete release for LC8
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4201
Re: LC8 DP 7 - Is this the most feature complete release for
Using LC8 DP12 the Message Box doesn't show up on Windows 10 Home Edition nor on Windows 7 Enterprise. I'm unfamiliar with filing a bug report. Is the quality section of the main site the proper place to file the report? As for the lack of desktop documentation, the dictionary seems to be absent. I ...
- Sun Jan 03, 2016 10:06 pm
- Forum: LiveCode Builder
- Topic: LC8 - Performance difference on Win 7 vs Win 10
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2955
LC8 - Performance difference on Win 7 vs Win 10
Colleagues, I am experiencing a LARGE performance difference in the "answer file" command on Windows 7 Professional versus Windows 10 Home. A lag of 3 seconds is present on Windows 7 professional and not present on Windows 10. The Windows 7 machine is company supplied and the disk is encrypted...tha...
- Sun Jan 03, 2016 9:59 pm
- Forum: LiveCode Builder
- Topic: LC8 DP 7 - Is this the most feature complete release for LC8
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4201
LC8 DP 7 - Is this the most feature complete release for LC8
Colleagues,
LC8 DP7 seems to work better for me. That is, as an example, the Message Box doesn't appear in DP 11 or 12. Also, the documentation seems to be there in DP 7 but not in the subsequent releases. Is this just me or is this the expected behavior?
Thank you,
Thomas
LC8 DP7 seems to work better for me. That is, as an example, the Message Box doesn't appear in DP 11 or 12. Also, the documentation seems to be there in DP 7 but not in the subsequent releases. Is this just me or is this the expected behavior?
Thank you,
Thomas